2016Nu79276 Revocation, such as refund of training subsidies and additional collection

SDR Co., Ltd.

The head of the Seoul Regional Employment and Labor Office Seoul Western Site

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Gudan54162 decided November 18, 2016

March 16, 2017

March 30, 2017

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant’s order to return KRW 174,943,801, the additional collection of KRW 174,943,801, the disposition of KRW 174,943,801, and the disposition of restricting subsidies and loans for 360 days from May 1, 2015 to April 25, 2016 shall be revoked.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the grounds for appeal by the plaintiff in this court do not differ significantly from that of the plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if each evidence submitted in the first instance trial is examined, the

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;

Judges Park Jong-young

Judges Lee Jong-hwan