2017Nu30896 Action for revocation of the designation of exclusive tourers

Escar Korea Ltd.

The Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2016Guhap5857 decided December 15, 2016

March 30, 2017

April 13, 2017

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

On March 28, 2016, the Defendant revoked the revocation of the designation of the exclusive travel agent for attracting Chinese group tourists.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: "No. 15 No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance is difficult"; "No. 1. 4 of the notification of the disposition of this case" contains "no. 3-2 of the prior notification of the disposition of this case"; however, "no. 14 and no. 15 of the notification of the disposition of this case" contains "no. 14 and no. 15 of the notification of the disposition of this case" as "no. 15 of the notification of the disposition of this case", and "no. 15 of the foreign currency income amount" is less than the standard point of the renewal of the disposition of this case, which is the ground for the disposition of this case, and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff's allegation of the prior notification of this case is inconsistent with the first instance judgment's explanation of the first instance court's 2016 prior to the filing of the lawsuit of this case."

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;

Judges Park Jong-young

Judges Lee Jong-hwan