beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines 2,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,00,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendants, as the occupants of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office Officetel, constituted “Etel Steering Committee” with the occupants opposing F, the representative of the said Officetel management body, and Defendant B served as the chairperson, Defendant A as the vice-chairperson, and Defendant C as the head of the management team.
1. On August 8, 2015, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residence intrusion) came to the office of the management body of the office of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Etel B 1.5th floor, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, and entered the office, with 20 to 30 occupants of the above officetel, set up a glnet in front of the office door and entered the above office door.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly invaded upon the structure managed by the victims against the will of G, H, etc., a single comprehensive management employee who entered into an officetel management contract with the victim F and the said F.
2. On August 8, 2015, the Defendants violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint property damage, etc.) provided the entrance door to Defendant C at the seat of Defendant B, and the Defendant C provided the entrance door using a tool.
As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the utility of the office entrance doors in the market price owned by the owners of officetels who are victims.
3. On August 8, 2015, the Defendants: (a) at the office of the managing body of the 1.5th floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office of the 1.5th floor, the Defendants had difficulty in business, with 20-30 members of the said office; (b) expressed their opposing opinions as to the victim F; (c) displayed a large volume of noise; and (d) removed the house equipment and fixtures in the said office.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with the victim F and the above F by force and interfered with the management of the above building, such as G and H, a single comprehensive management employee who entered into an officetel management contract with G and H.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A and C’s respective legal statements 1.