The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

All the costs of the original judgment and the trial shall be borne by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not assault D, but the lower court erred by misapprehending the fact that the Defendant committed an injury, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is consistent with the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., ① the defendant voluntarily discussed in the investigative agency that "at the time of the instant case, there is a fact that she has sleeped, pushed down, and shaking the other clothes," and there was an agreement with D on September 30, 2013 in order to smoothly conclude the instant case, ② from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, the defendant stated that "I would like to see the flick of the person who has made the statement, flick, and flick with drinking," and the police officer sent to the investigative agency upon receipt of the report from D to the court of the court of the court below that "at the time of the instant case, the defendant did not have to have any special doubt about the credibility of the statement and diagnosis statement on the date of the instant case," and the judgment of the court below that "I would like to find the defendant's flick and flick with the Defendant stated that "after.".

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is without merit, and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, as a sanction against the Defendant’s refusal to commit a crime by force until the trial is held, Article 191(1) and the main sentence of Article 190(1) and the main sentence of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall apply.