The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The costs of the original judgment shall be borne by the defendant.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal did not assault D, the judgment of the court below which recognized the crime of injury to the defendant is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The judgment of the court below is justified in the judgment of the court below in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., ① the defendant submitted a written diagnosis of injury by consistently making the defendant's statement from the investigation process to the court below that "C has maintained a dubial dubl with each other," and the circumstances to particularly doubt the credibility of the statement and diagnosis letter were not peeped, ② the defendant also stated in the investigative agency that "at the time, there is a dubl with each other and a dubl with each other," and the facts charged in this case are recognized during the second trial of the court below. ③ The photographs taken on the day of the case also clearly revealed the e proxy driving engineer's flabl with red blicking d, so it can be sufficiently acknowledged that the defendant was guilty of the facts charged in this case.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. The defendant is responsible for fighting with D by pretending to be an acting engineer who has taken care of the defendant. Nevertheless, the court below's original rejection was made at the court below, and a fine has been reduced by more than the summary order (50,000 won) to the virtue that the defendant led to confession on the second trial date, and appealed the confession at the court below. In the first trial, the defendant reversed the confession at the court below, and did not reflect at all while denying the crime again, and thus, the defendant is subject to sanctions against this, thereby ordering the defendant to bear the costs of lawsuit by applying Article 191 (1) and Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.