The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In relation to the main point of the grounds for appeal, the Defendant did not support the victim C’s spabling and walking the spath by cutting down the spath.

Nevertheless, the court below found the victim C guilty of this part of the charges by reliance on the statements made by the victim C without credibility. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles.

2. The judgment of the court below reveals the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., (1) the victim C has consistently stated the facts of injury from the investigative agency to the court of the court below; (2) the victim C stated “the cause of injury” column of the injury diagnosis letter as “the victim C was treated at the hospital on the date of the injury; and (3) the witness E also provided a written confirmation that the defendant would drive the victim C’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sher her her her her her her sher her her her her her hersher her her her her her her her.....