beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to pay below shall be revoked.
The defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 31, 2010, the Plaintiff visited the “Dental” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant dental license”) operated by the Defendant, which was a dentist. On June 9, 2010, the Plaintiff received surgery from the Defendant on June 15, 2010, 13, 23, and 25 on the part of the Defendant to install a fluord temporary infant on June 18, 201, installed the fluor, and completed the treatment on March 18, 2011.
B. On December 31, 2010, the Plaintiff complained of the above treatment to the effect that the Plaintiff is a stove, and the Defendant adjusted the stove, and on January 12, 2011, the Plaintiff complained of the s to the effect that the stoves of the stoves (an interim device temporarily installed in the artificial stoves attached in ging in gings) were laid off, and received first aid from the emergency room to go beyond the stove, and even on February 18, 2011, the Plaintiff was undergoing a procedure to produce and install new stoves in the above four stoves, and the Plaintiff consistently complained of the stoves and face shape of the stoves on the right side of the stove.
C. As of August 22, 2014, the Plaintiff’s physical assessment was conducted, the Plaintiff’s fluorous eggs No. 13,23, and 25 (e.g., e., e., e., e., spathicals) are connected to the ground (e.g., spathicals, in the form of artificial spathics and metal objects) but upper spathics are not installed, and upper spathics (human spathics) are scattered in the fluoral field and covered with the surrounding annual organization by the fluorian’s 15th fluorics price.
In addition, it was cut off on May 201, 201 by Sychina No. 15, and from that time, the Plaintiff lost its original function.
In addition, on December 2, 2011, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the above hospital to take a sama for the treatment of bad faith, and thereafter, the Plaintiff was diagnosed at the same hospital on August 16, 2012, No. 47, 46, 35, and 37.