beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The plaintiff's claims extended by this court against the defendants are all filed.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. The facts of recognition 1) Defendant B and C are E dental clinics (hereinafter “instant hospital”) between July 21, 2014 and October 10, 2015.
(2) From July 31, 2014 to October 10, 2015, the Plaintiff was treated as the medical doctor who treated the Plaintiff, and Defendant D was treated as the head of the hospital and the doctor in charge of the trust department of the instant hospital, and Defendant D was treated as the user of Defendant B and C.
3) On September 15, 2014, Defendant C launched the Plaintiff No. 47 Plaintiff’s 47, and the Plaintiff was treated as spawd on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff from November 13, 2014 to December 29, 2014 at the instant hospital, the Plaintiff was treated as spawd on the lower-hand side of the 1 Daegu (26 pawdia) and the second Daegu (27 pawdia).
5) On December 29, 2014, Defendant B attached the final supplementary scrap metal to the Plaintiff’s 1 Daegu value (No. 36) and the 2 Daegu value (No. 37) on the left-hand side of the Haakak, and Defendant B sent the Plaintiff’s 1 Daegu value (No. 46) on January 7, 2015. Defendant B complained of inconvenience to the Plaintiff’s unity of Haak, Defendant B added the supplementary scrap metal to the 1 Daegu value (No. 36) on the left-hand side of the Haakak, and the 2 Daegu value (No. 37) on the left-hand side of the Haakak (No. 36) on March 28, 2015.
Since then, as the Plaintiff complained of inconvenience, the doctor in charge of October 7, 2015 changed to Defendant C, and on October 7, 2015, Defendant C removed the existing scrap metal in order to re-production the said scrap metal.
7) Since the Plaintiff’s crypt operation, Defendant B performed an operation to find out the Plaintiff’s crypt (11 and 21 crypt crypt crypt cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp cryp c
9 On November 13, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the K University Dental Hospital affiliated to the F University of Dentalology as “accident-free or limited dental disease,” and the injury and injury’s “nOS, nOS, and brance”. The diagnosis was conducted.