logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.10.13 2015고단2636
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등폭행)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 3, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right bridge at the crosswalk at the entrance of the Daejeon Complex Terminal located in the Daejeon East-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, on the ground that the victim B (the age of 36) interfered with the Defendant’s course by pushing the bridge on the front of the C cab operated by the Defendant, while having been in dispute, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right bridge.

2. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant was investigated as a suspect at the Criminal Team Office of the Daejeon East Police Station in Daejeon, Dong-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, at around 13:34, 2015, at the Criminal Team Office of the Daejeon Police Station in the 670-gu, Daejeon, and was required to present an identification card to verify his/her identity.

The defendant, who is a public document that was held by the head of the Daejeon Provincial Police Agency, did not use his official document by presenting the E driver's license under the name of the defendant who was living together with the defendant as the driver's license of the defendant.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place under the above 2. Item 2., prepared a protocol of interrogation of a suspect in order to concealment the fact that he/she driven a taxi registered under the name of E, a student of the Defendant, and conducted an investigation by E, and then forged the signature of other person with the intention of exercising the seal of E on the name side of the protocol of interrogation of suspect, stating that he/she is “E” in the name column of the end statement

3. The Defendant, at the time and place under the above 2. Paragraph (2) above, issued the suspect interrogation protocol that forged E’s signature to the police officers under the above 2. Paragraph (2) and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the suspect examination protocol (Evidence No. 4);

1. Articles 261, 260 (1), 230, and 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow