A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year on July 25, 2014 at the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months of imprisonment for the crime of forging a signature.

[2014Kadan534] On January 7, 2015, the Defendant, at a cafeteria located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, inflicted an injury on the victim, i.e., damage to coconc that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the face of the victim when drinking alcohol together with the victim D while drinking alcohol together with the victim D. On the other hand, the Defendant suffered an injury, such as damage to coconc that requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the face of the victim.

[2014 Highest 3479]

1. Forgery of private signature;

A. On January 8, 2014, the Defendant entered “E” as his/her name, in the form of confirmation confirmation confirming that he/she was arrested as a flagrant offender at the Yangcheon Police Station located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul, and that he/she was notified of his/her rights as a flagrant offender.

B. At around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendant was under investigation of the suspect for assault at the above Yangcheon Police Station criminal and the office of criminal two teams offices, and the police officers in charge of questioning personal information and criminal facts stated E’s name and resident registration number to the police officers in charge of questioning criminal facts, and stated “E” in the statement column at the end of the interrogation protocol of suspect interrogation.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged E's signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his authority.

2. Events of the above investigation and signature;

A. The defendant 1-A

At the time and place stated in paragraph G, police officers G who knew of the forgery of the signature, submitted a document of forgery of the signature of E as if it was duly formed.

B. The defendant 1-B

At the time and place stated in the paragraph, the police officer F, who knew of the forgery of the signature, submitted the protocol of interrogation of the suspect who forged E’s signature to the police officer F as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

[2014 Highest 534]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. A medical certificate of injury [2014 highest 3479] 1.