logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.22 2014고정1693
사기등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, even though the monthly rent deposit of 103 of the multi-family house in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, in which Defendant B leased and resided, have increased the deposit money according to the lease contract even though the monthly rent deposit of 3 million won, and were willing to offer it as security and receive

1. On May 6, 2013, the Defendants forged private documents, using a computer from the PC bank near the dwelling location of Defendant B located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the deposit column for the multi-family house lease contract using the computer, the Defendants stated “10 million won in daily (10,000,000)” and “D’s name column for the lessor’s name” and posted the above D’s seal arbitrarily inscribed on the name next to the name.

As a result, the Defendants forged one copy of the multi-family house lease contract in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

2. At around 14:00 on May 6, 2013, the Defendants: (a) borrowed 6 million won from the credit service provider E who knew of the forgery at the Defendant’s residence located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) delivered the forged lease contract as if it was duly concluded.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use a forged lease contract.

3. On May 6, 2013, the Defendants presented the forged lease contract (monthly rent) as referred to in paragraph 1 at the G law office of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 601 G law office to the victim E as collateral and borrowed a total of six million won from the victim each by mutual guarantee by way of mutual guarantee.

The Defendants conspired to induce the victim as such and received a total of 6 million won from the victim, namely, the money borrowed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A multi-household lease contract;

1. Cash custody certificate;

1. Application of statutes on a copy of a notarial deed;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 231 of the Criminal Act, and the Criminal Act.

arrow