logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2017.09.21 2017고단90
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 15, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on July 15, 201, and four months, respectively.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 25, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (dless driving) on the following occasions: (a) on April 25, 2017: (b) on the road from the road in front of the south Jin-gun of the Namjin-gun to the road in front of a D-C restaurant located in the same military C; (c) on the road from the road in front of the D-C restaurant located in the same military; (d) on the road from the road in front of the D-C village in the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.051% while under the influence of alcohol

2. After the Defendant was discovered by drinking or unlicensed driving on the front of the above D cafeteria around the day, such as the electronic records of the company, and the electronic records of the above C cafeteria, the Defendant sent his/her resident registration number to the police officer of the Gangwon Police Station who was outside of the jurisdiction, and then sent his/her signature on the screen of the notification of the results of drinking driving control after entering his/her resident registration number known to the Defendant on a portable police terminal (PDA) and requesting the said F to sign on the screen.

As a result, the Defendant neglected the part of the notification driver's confirmation as a result of the G-name alcohol driving control, which is a private electronic record on the certification of facts for the purpose of handling administrative affairs. In other words, the Defendant sent the notification driver's confirmation to the police internal computer network as if it was duly formed as a result of the so-called so-called the above-mentioned driver's confirmation.

Summary of Evidence

Paragraph 1 of the judgment

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report of the circumstances of driving at home, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and the driving license ledger (A);

1. Previous conviction: Paragraph (2) of the judgment of inquiry about criminal history;

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow