A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court, and a summary order of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on May 9, 2016.

1. On April 21, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.167% in blood without a driver’s license for a vehicle on April 21, 2017, and the Defendant was driving B 5 km from the street front of the center of the new seat center in Busan Gangseo-gu to the road front of the signal signal crossing in Busan Gangseo-gu, in the condition of under the influence of alcohol content of 0.167% in blood.

Therefore, even though the Defendant violated two times or more due to drinking, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol as above.

2. On April 21, 2017, at around 23:45, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was discovered by drinking driving under the above paragraph (1) to a slope C, a police officer belonging to the Busan Gangseo Police Station, who is under the control of drinking on the front of the signal bridge located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and (b) was found to have shown the Defendant’s cell phone pictures showing the victim D’s driver’s license, and used the victim’s resident registration number E by notifying the victim of the victim’s resident registration number E.

3. The Defendant entered a notice of the results of drinking driving control into “D” by a slope C, a police officer controlling drinking driving, for the purpose of performing administrative affairs at the time, place, such as electronic records, etc. and electronic records of the above writers, and signed electronic documents at the PDA session presented for the signature of the driver.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is an electronic record for proving the fact, has forged the signature of the notified driver as a result of the drinking driving control in the traffic police computer network, and made it possible to transmit the signature of the notified driver as a result of the drinking driving control, which is an electronic record, to a traffic computer network.