logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.18 2015나5467
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged based on the following facts: (a) there is no dispute between the parties; (b) evidence No. 1 to No. 8; (c) evidence No. 1 to No. 10; (d) witness H’s testimony; and (e) the physical examination of the head of the high school of the first instance; and (e) the results of the first instance court’s entrustment of physical examination of the head of the high school of the first instance to the high school of the first instance; and (e) the purport of the entire

A. On October 9, 2012, around 17:16, 2012, the Plaintiff received H’s game support, which is a game assistant, from G golf courses located in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. (hereinafter “instant golf course”) operated by the Defendant, and led to golf games.

나. 원고는 19:30경 위 골프장 9번 홀의 티박스에서 티샷을 한 후 티박스 좌측 전방에 있던 카트 근처로 이동하여 대기하고 있었다.

그런데 C가 티샷을 한 공이 왼쪽으로 급격히 꺾이면서 카트 근처에서 대기하고 있던 원고의 이마 부위에 맞았다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

The Plaintiff suffered injuries, such as an open dubal coloning surgery and two dubal coloning surgery on the same day due to the instant accident, and an open dubal coloning surgery requiring medical treatment for a period of ten weeks.

In the forepart of the instant golf course 9, the cart road was designed in U.S., and the golf cart is a structure that can stop in the Tambling field, and the kids in the direction of the road on the left side of the Tambling place.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts, C, while predicting the direction of the public passage of its own golf games, was examined as to whether it is not located in another person's place where it can be adjacent to another person's place within the scope of the public passage, and it is found that C was negligent in failing to perform his/her duty of care, despite the fact that there was a duty of care to live the public.

(b) In addition, the above facts of recognition are golf courses.

arrow