Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months and by a fine of up to five million won.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 20, 2016, the Defendants: (a) installed a ctel in Jeju Island with an interview and management of the women engaged in sexual traffic; (b) Defendant B conspireded to take charge of the promotion of sexual traffic; (c) the receipt of reservations; and (d) the male guidance for sexual traffic; and (c) leased three c buildings D, E, and F, respectively.

The Defendants, from October 22, 2016 to November 16, 2016, employed women of the said C building D, E, and F, to have them enter into a sexual intercourse with the men who find the place of sexual traffic, including G and H, by having them receive KRW 1.70,00 won from the sexual traffic price, and stated the facts charged in the indictment of KRW 70,00 among them as “one hundred thousand won,” but according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, the Defendants are deemed to be the clerical error of “seven thousand won,” and thus, recognized as above.

was received.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of the I, H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports, text messages, on-site photographs, text records, trading agreements, lease contracts, investigation reports (Attachment to details of accounts in the name of a suspect B), account details, and investigation reports (verification of deposit amounts of KRW 135,000,000 to a suspect J company);

1. Relevant Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., imprisonment with prison labor and fines concurrently;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for each of the instant sentencing orders are all considered, and the following circumstances should be taken into account. In particular, the favorable circumstances are that the Defendants reflects the facts charged and the operating period is not significantly long.