1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the above cancellation portion is dismissed.

3.

1. From August 8, 2011 to August 18, 2011, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant, a dentist, was negligent in the Defendant’s treatment of 1st century (No. 14; hereinafter referred to as “child”) and 1st instance-gu (No. 56; hereinafter referred to as “46th pathy”) of the right side, and received treatment to remove the existing human being of 1st century from the Defendant, the right side of which, as well as from the first day of August 8, 2011 to the first day of August, 14, 201, the Plaintiff was under treatment of 1st rastalate after the first day of the month after the first day of the day of the day of the day of the first day of the day of the day of the day of the first day of the day of the day of the day of the first day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the first day of the day of the day of the day of the first day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day of the day.

The Defendant did not notify the Plaintiff of the possibility of changing the above medical malpractice and learal, and was unjustly paid excessive costs by providing excessive treatment during a series of treatment processes.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 18,40,60 (3,066,600,000,000,000,000 for 3,066,000 for clinal treatment expenses of 172,00 won for clinal treatment expenses of KRW 172,00 for crinal treatment expenses of KRW 54,50,00 for crinal treatment expenses of KRW 174,00 for cinal treatment expenses of KRW 172,50,00), and damages for delay due to personnel malpractice.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant’s medical malpractice and error.