1. On August 20, 201, the Plaintiff against the Defendant based on medical treatment, such as medical treatment conducted to the Defendant after August 20, 2011.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 20, 201, the Defendant visited the hospital operated by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”) (hereinafter “Plaintiff hospital”) due to the outbreak of Ma26 dental services, and was diagnosed as Ma17, Ma27, and Ma27, and was diagnosed as Ma26, first of all, to remove Ma26 dental services and received Mac-rating treatment on the face of the strike.

B. On August 24, 2011, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff Hospital, temporarily recovered the part of the Mesium of the Mesium of the Mesium of the Plaintiff Hospital on August 24, 2011. On September 2, 2011, the Defendant taken an Mesium of the Mesium of the Mesium of the Mesium of the Mesium of the Mesium of the same month and received the Mesium

C. On January 27, 2012, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff Hospital, was given a safeguard and vegetative treatment after taking a flag photo on a flag on the Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean, Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mea, and Mean Mean Mean Mean

The defendant, at the plaintiff hospital on February 9, 2012, on the 13th day of the same month, on the 15th day of the same month, and on the 20th day of the same month, was suffering from neutal treatment, and continued to provide leutal treatment to Mesia Ma27 on the 23th day of the same month, continued to provide leutal treatment to Mesia, and received leutal treatment from Mesia Ma27 on the 27th day of the same month.

E. The Defendant, at the Plaintiff Hospital on March 6, 2012, Ma27, adjusted the Plaintiff’s Ma27 Ma, sent Ma38 Mao on the 19th of the same month, received post-treatment on the 19th of the same month, and received Ma38 Mao, and received Mano Mano Ma17 Mano Mao.

F. After that, the Defendant, at the Plaintiff Hospital on March 28, 2012; on the 30th of the same month; on April 3, 2012; and on April 3, 2012, he continued to receive neutological treatment; and on May 2, 2012, removed neute of Mere Mere Ma17.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 through 4, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff alleged by the parties has no negligence in the course of medical treatment and treatment of the defendant's infant, and therefore there is no obligation to compensate the defendant for the damages alleged by the defendant.