1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff ordering payment is revoked.

The defendant shall make the plaintiff 1,00.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 19, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to the Defendant’s test for taking photographs of marma radioactive rays and to the crypting (crypt removal) from the Defendant, and the Plaintiff was diagnosed with cryptosis for 13 and 44, and where part of the fry was lost due to crypt charging, etc., the Plaintiff was charged with inserting the fry space of the fry as dental materials. There was math, dust, gold, symix, etc. using charging materials, and the price of the fry is relatively low compared with the natural fry and relatively low.

was given medical treatment.

In addition, as for the 45 Absia, the Absia was diagnosed with refluence and refluorrosion, and was treated with refluence and refluoration.

B. On August 30, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of pains against the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the instant procedures”) No. 45, following the Defendant’s completion of the instant procedures (hereinafter “the instant procedures”). On the other hand, the Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment from the Defendant for pains, refused to accept the instant medical treatment, and received a prescription only.

On September 10, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the above pain certificate, and some of the flusium charge and prescription for the flusium No. 45, and was given from the Defendant on September 16, 2014, part of the flusium charge treatment on the flusium No. 45 and 13.

C. On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) sought to the Defendant for reimbursement of the expenses incurred in relation to the occurrence of the post-distribution certificate under each of the instant procedures for two to three hours; (b) the Plaintiff claimed for reimbursement of the expenses incurred in relation to the pre-existing medical treatment and the expenses incurred in the future disbursement; (c) the Defendant prepared a letter of statement (Evidence 1) stating that the Plaintiff will bear the expenses incurred in the event that he/she is subject to the instant treatment due to symptoms arising from the Plaintiff’s medical treatment; and (d) the Defendant prepared and delivered it to the Plaintiff.

Since then, the main medical treatment details received by the plaintiff with respect to the child of 45 times which was the most serious aftermath from other medical institutions are as follows.

On September 29, 2014, the treatment content of a doctor in charge of a temporary hospital is D and E inward treatment.