1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant's treatment against the plaintiff's dental child;

A. On December 24, 2013, the Plaintiff was consulted with the Defendant’s “C” (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) on the following grounds: (a) around December 24, 2013, food was flick food, so that the Plaintiff was inconvenient, in particular, under the left side, and the inconvenience and pain of the baby was serious.

At the time, as a result of the inspection of the Plaintiff’s state of baby, the Defendant judged that the previous scrap metal was worn out, and the treatment of nine young children was required due to the lack of the aggregate, and the Defendant tried to provide a phased treatment after consultation with the Plaintiff.

B. The Defendant’s specific process of treatment against the Plaintiff is as follows.

On December 24, 2013, 201 Ma36 Doz. Removal of Ma36 Doz. Ma1, 201, Ma36 Doz. Ma2, Ma36 Madz. Madz. Madz. 2, 2013, Madz. Madz. 2, Madz. Madz. 2, 206 Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. Madz. 2, 207 Madz. Madz. Madz. 2, 2014