The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On April 1, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered the personal information of E in the power of delegation for the application for issuance of an abstract, such as the inspection or copy of the resident registration card, at the D community service center located in G in Gansi-si, Chungcheongnam-si on April 1, 2014; (b) stated the “E” in the “Marriage Report” in the “use and purpose column; and (c) stated in the “E” in the “E” column; and (d) held in advance thereafter.

E’s seal affixed a letter of delegation to apply for the perusal or issuance of an abstract of the resident registration card of a private document concerning the verification of facts in the name of E, and submitted a forged letter to F public official in charge of the civil petition office F who is aware of the forgery as above.

2) On October 8, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, entered the personal information of E in the husband column of the marriage report, and was in possession of it next to it, at the public service center of the Suwon-si, which is located in 435, as agreed in the Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si.

A copy of the marriage report, which is a private document concerning the verification of facts under the E’s name, was forged, and the public official in charge of the civil petition office who is aware of the forgery was submitted a copy of the forged marriage report to be held.

(b) The defendant shall be entitled to paragraph (1) for an event, such as an electronic record, etc., which contains a false entry and false electronic record;

A. (2) On the same date and time as indicated in paragraph (1), and at the same place, filing a false report as if he/she had been married with E by submitting a forged marriage report to a public official in charge of the civil petition office at the same time and place, and having the public official record the false fact that the Defendant and E were married with E in the public records of family relations registration information system, and exercising the same by having the public official store and operate the family relation registration information system in which such false fact was recorded.

2. The E Police, the Prosecutor’s Office, and the Prosecutor’s Office, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court: