The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. Facts charged;

A. At around 14:30 on October 15, 201, the primary charges charged by the Defendant: (a) and the victim E (the age of 54) who made a demand for the settlement of debt at the D Real Estate Office in Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu; (b) were in dispute with each other; (c) and (d) the victim, as the victim was at the time of the victim, was her seated, and was her seated, for the reason that the victim her frighted, “I would frier far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far far f

B. At around 14:30 on October 15, 201, the Defendant: (a) 14:30, Goyang-gu, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, and the Defendant used the victim’s left hand by her hand on the ground that (i) the victim E (at the age of 54) who has caused a dispute and (ii) the repayment of debt, and (iii) the victim was able to be at the time of the victim, and (iv) the victim, who was frighted, was frighted, for the reason that (i) the victim was her at the time of the test, and (ii) the victim was her at the time of the test, and (iii) the victim’s her back head was salked with the victim’s back head, and (iv) the victim was salked with the victim’s back hand by continuously pushing the victim.

2. Among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, each police interrogation protocol against the defendant is inadmissible, and thus inadmissible.

The remaining evidences presented by the prosecutor revealing that E’s primary facts charged or ancillary facts are consistent with the facts charged, and the following facts charged are difficult to readily believe in light of the results of this court’s entrustment to the Dong National University Hospital and the written opinion (F specialist) written by the Defendant on the Sungsan Hospital and the content of the statement of the witness examination protocol on the witness H of this court.