A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

From August 15, 2013, the Defendant was in a de facto marital relationship with the victim E (the age of 54) from August 15, 2013 to the victim E (the age of 54).

around 19:55 on March 6, 2015, the Defendant: “I want to do so in the above D church for the following reasons: “I want to do so for the same year, three years, three years, and more;

At first, I wish to do so.

As nmna, he saw that he is only a very hot face as her mother, she spawn, spawn ........" When she took the bath, she assaulted the victim, such as 10 times at least 10 times by her head click, her head blicking, and her head blicking the victim's blick, and her blicking the victim's head blick, thereby causing damage to the victim

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Recordings, voice files, and photographs (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant merely expressed the defendant's desire to have a victim and had no assault with the content as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, but comprehensively taking account of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant and his defense counsel's argument cannot be accepted.)

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Part concerning the dismissal of the prosecution under suspended execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the agreement with the victim, degree of damage, etc.);

1. Facts charged;

A. On March 5, 2015, the Defendant: “G” located in Mayang-si F on March 5, 2015, the Defendant deemed the victim E to be “to live well in the future” in the back of the “G,” but, on the ground that the victim refused to “I will not live well in the future,” the Defendant’s “I would make I would have to live in the future. I would like to make I would have the same idea so that I would see it after face.”