logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2012.12.13 2012고단1425
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On July 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the Asan Police Station Station, located in Asan City R on July 10, 2012; (b) “The principal confirms that the above entries are inconsistent with the facts; and (c) write his name below the signature seal affixed; and (d) affix his seal on the side; (c)

B. U’s name is written in the statement of the circumstances of a host driver, stating that “I, as a person subject to a license (Suspension and Revocation), confirm that the above contents were identical to the facts, obtain notice that blood collection may be conducted, and sign and seal the blood collection (not wanting to do so).”

C. He/she received a police officer’s request for voluntary behavior at the “the date and place above,” and notified that he/she may refuse it, as well as to freely leave from the police officer at any time, and confirmed that he/she voluntarily responded to the voluntary behavior.

under the “name of U,” and affixed a seal on the next page,

(d) after stating in the self-statement on the particulars of the drinking driving, “I have no available driving. I have stated that I will be U on the name next to the statement and affixed a seal on that name.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a report on the detection of a host driver, a circumstantial statement of a host driver, a written consent of voluntary driving, and a letter of self-driving in U.S., each of which is a private document of certification of fact.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same time and place as the above “1”, issued to police officers slope T, who knew of the forgery, a forged driver detection report, the circumstantial statement of the driver, voluntary behavior statement, and self-written statement as if they were a document duly formed. 3. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act on the ground of the foregoing “1”, respectively.

arrow