logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.10.17 2019고단2555
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 03:00 on October 14, 2016, the Defendant driven a car in F Sti-type under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.06% at a section of approximately 150 meters from C before the 150-meter radius to E in the following: (a) around 03:00:

2. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration number.

Nevertheless, at around 03:32 on October 14, 2016, the Defendant was requested to present a driver’s license by the B District Office of the Dosan Police Station B located in the Dosan-si B, the Defendant denied another person’s resident registration number by means of the Defendant’s pro-friendly resident registration number, who was out of the Republic of Korea, in advance.

3. At around 03:40 on October 14, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the name of H in the driver column stating that “I will sign the blood collection because I will not originally obtain the blood collection,” and then affix a seal thereon in the driver column of the Yansan Police Station B located in B of the Yansan Police Station B located in the said G. In the report on the circumstances of the driver’s license prepared by the said G, I confirmed that the above contents were identical to the facts; (b) confirmed that I would be subject to the suspension of driver’s license (cancellation); and (c) notified that I would collect the blood in unfair cases.”

On the other hand, the Defendant continued to enter H’s name in the principal’s column of voluntary behavior, affixed his/her seal, affixed his/her name in the column, attached his/her signature in the column of consent to the collection of blood, and then delivered the forged driver’s statement and voluntary behavior report, and written consent to the collection of blood to the said G who was unaware of the forgery of the forged document, as if it were a document duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged the driver's name, voluntary and voluntary written consent to blood collection, and exercised it.

4...

arrow