logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 09. 08. 선고 2016두43473 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 부동산이 양도일 당시 사실상 농지였다고 볼 수 없음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu70821 ( June 22, 2016)

Title

(Trial Disorder) The real estate of this case cannot be deemed to have been farmland at the time of the transfer date.

Summary

It is insufficient to recognize that farmland was farmland at the time of the transfer date, and that it was farmland actually used for cultivation or temporarily in a state of temporary suspension.

Cases

2016du43473 Revocation of revocation of capital gains tax rectification

Plaintiff-Appellant

Park ○

Defendant-Appellee

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

National Rotations

Imposition of Judgment

September 8, 2016

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow