beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2016Nu53949 ( April 8, 2016)
Title
(C) 8 years ago
Summary
(C) In the absence of objective evidence of the fact that the land was directly cultivated for at least eight years, the reduction or exemption is not granted.
Cases
2016Du37478 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax
Plaintiff-Appellant
Red○ ○
Defendant-Appellee
○ Head of tax office
Judgment of the lower court
National Rotations
Imposition of Judgment
July 29, 2016
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by