beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases:
The 2th 8,9th 8, and 9th 9th of the first instance court's ruling "The Content Production Headquarters," which is newly organized by the defendant, shall be the head of the headquarters.
(b) The three-dimensional “209,496,745 won” in the first instance trial is deemed to be “161,151,342 won” and the three-dimensional “193,585,600 won” shall be deemed to be “148,912,000 won” and the four-lane “15,911,145 won” shall be deemed to be “12,239,342 won”.
(c) 3rd 16th 16th 16th e.g. “B 3 through 9, 13, 35, and 36” are “B 3 through 13, 19 through 36, 39, and 40.”
Following the 3rd 18th 18th 19,00 "sales Objectives", the term "7,519,136,000" is added and the term "1,196,00,000" is added after the 20th 21st 21st 21st "sales Objectives". "8,180,000,000" is added.
(e) 4th decision of the first instance court is the first instance court’s 1st decision to “the invitation of the Plaintiff” as “the planning of the Plaintiff.”
F. No. 4 of the judgment of the first instance court No. 4, "No. 3 of the 4th judgment" added to "the defendant, according to the plaintiff's plan, invested KRW 915 billion in the defendant, invested KRW 2.5 billion from IMC Investment Co., Ltd., and produced an animation of the FF Act from around 2012 to around 2013. However, the profits from the sale, etc. of the above animation sales right are only KRW 370,000,000,000,000 won, 6."
(g) 4.5 of the first instance judgment “...........” added the following:
The plaintiff asserts that the amount invested by the plaintiff should be included in the defendant's sales caused by the plaintiff for the production of the above drama and animation. However, the plaintiff's right to purchase the drama and animation produced by the defendant, as planned by the plaintiff.