All of the Plaintiff’s appeal and the claim selectively added by this court are dismissed.

after the filing of an appeal.

Basic Facts

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the stated in Article 2(a) of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, except as follows.

During the judgment of the first instance court 2nd 15th 15th 15th 15th 15th 18th 18th 18th 18th 18th 18th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 4th 3rd 4th 3rd 4th 3rd 4th 201st 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 200, “the Defendant Union,” “the Defendant Union,” “paragraph (2)”, “by the resolution of May 8, 2017”, “the resolution of May 8, 2017” was added to “(hereinafter “the resolution of May 8, 2017”) and “the modification” was changed from “the change” to “the change of the assignment.”

The term "(5)" in paragraph (5) of the judgment of the first instance court shall be deemed to be "Ma.", and the term "resolution of June 1, 2017" in the fourth two pages shall be deemed to be "Resolution of June 21, 2017".

The first instance court's decision 4th 3th 2th 1st 3th 2th 2018, "6th 6th 3th 3th 201," "the prosecutor of the District Prosecutors' Office in Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office" added "the prosecutor of the District Prosecutors' Office in January 17, 2018" and "the illegal use" read "the suspicion of unlawful use" and "the non-prosecution disposition of suspicion of suspicion (non-prosecution of evidence)" as "the non-prosecution disposition of suspicion of suspicion (non-prosecution of evidence)". The first instance court's decision 4th 5th 5th 5th 21th 1st 21th 21st 21st 21st 3th 202."

"8" in the first instance judgment of the court of first instance is "h".

“However,” “The Defendant Union appealed against the part on the claim for confirmation of status held in the above judgment,” respectively, and added “the part on the claim for confirmation of status held” to “as the reasons for the second part of the same judgment,” and changed to “the part on the claim for confirmation of status held” during the same conduct.

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff is Defendant 1 through the resolution of May 8, 2017 of the Defendant Union and the change of the assignment of the instant case.