1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the judgment by the court concerning this part of the underlying facts is as follows, given that the reasoning of the judgment by the court is the same from the second to the fifth five pages of the judgment by the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as follows:

[Supplementary or additional parts] The second 10 Doz. “170 Doz.” added “24,918.45 Doz.” to “170 Doz.

2. On the 11st day of the first instance judgment, “the instant trust real estate” is added to the “sectioned building” (hereinafter referred to as “instant trust real estate”) following the second day of the judgment of the first instance.

Following the second 11th 11th Appellate Decision, “this case’s trust contract” (hereinafter “instant trust contract”) was added.

After the 3rd judgment of the first instance court, the “F” was added to the “10 billion won” (the F’s loan amount is KRW 10 billion). The 3rd judgment of the first instance court raises “G” to the “F”. The 3rd judgment of the first instance court is adding “24,862,942,820 won (the appraised value as of June 10, 2013)” following the 3rd judgment of the first instance court.

The 3rd 18th 18th 10th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 2th 2th 2th 20

Following the judgment of the court of first instance, “not later than October 2013,” 20: (a) the term “a free contract” is added to the fourth 2nd 2nd 2nd m2 in the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) the term “a housing construction project that constructs apartment units” is added to “49,860 square meters [the percentage of the instant trust real estate out of the entire project site is approximately 50% (=24,918.45 square meters, 49,860 square meters) of the instant trust real estate, including the instant trust real estate] in Ulsan-gu L, Ulsan-gu, and 286 square meters (including the instant trust real estate].

After the judgment of the first instance court 4 pages 3, “Slsan Metropolitan City Mayor added “Around that time, the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor determined a day-to-day zone with a size of 81,705 square meters adjacent to the said project site, including the said project site, and announced the purport of the decision and the topographic map on March 6, 2014.”

Pursuant to the first instance court Decision 4 20 Doz. 2015

4. The term “29.” is changed to “ April 29, 2015.”

The 5th judgment of the first instance court is followed by the 16th judgment.