1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendant's 676,297,232 won to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor and 221,757.

1. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The term "Plaintiff supplementary intervenor" shall be referred to as "Plaintiff supplementary intervenor" collectively.

3. The following shall be added to the nine lines:

F. On September 3, 2019, the Plaintiff re-transfered the claim for loans to the Defendant to the Plaintiff’s succeeding Intervenor, and notified the Defendant of the above transfer on or around April 16, 2020.” 3rd 10 pages “A evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5” are considered as “A evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5.”

The 3rd "Plaintiff" of the 14th line shall be regarded as "Plaintiff-Succession Intervenor".

The "Plaintiff" of the last 3rd line shall be deemed to be the "Defendant".

4. The Plaintiff’s claim for the takeover amount is also null and void, and the Plaintiff’s claim for the takeover amount is also null and void, and the Plaintiff’s claim for the takeover amount is also null and void. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for the takeover amount by the Plaintiff’s successor is without merit.”

4 The "Witness of the Witness M" of the 20 line shall be regarded as the "Witness of the first instance trial".

2. The claim of the plaintiff succeeding intervenor should be accepted on the grounds of the reasoning.

Since the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff succeeded to the Plaintiff at this time, and the Plaintiff withdraws from this court, the judgment of the first instance is modified as stated in paragraph (1) of the Disposition.