Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged was divorced with C, the mother of the victim B(the age of 31), and the Defendant was accused of fraud, embezzlement, etc. and was under investigation by an investigative agency. Around June 2012, the Defendant was required to arrange issues such as return of ecoos car and taxes, etc., which were going from the victim.
On June 19, 2012, from around 02:12 to around 02:35 of the same day, the Defendant mard the phone with a cell phone from the victim’s cell phone, and threatened the victim with fear of danger and injury to the victim, such as “this sone’s embare, embare, embare, embare, embare, internal organs, embare, embare, embare, embare, embare, embare, embare, embare, spine, embare, embare, embare, embare, and so on.”
B. On June 19, 2012, at around 02:35, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with fear that it would cause any danger and injury to the victim, such as “the victim, she shall do so, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, and argue” at a place in the flusium.
C. At around 14:30 on March 18, 2013, the Defendant: (a) placed the front door of the victim’s vehicle in front of the civil petitioner’s parking lot located in the Suwon-dong District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si in Suwon-si in order to prevent the victim from putting the front door of the victim’s vehicle in hand; and (b) placed the victim into verbal abuse, such as “I want to throw the kn
2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim B submitted a written withdrawal of complaint to the court on October 16, 2013, which is the date of the instant indictment, to the effect that the defendant does not want to be punished, pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.