logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.12.09 2020고정577
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is living in and around the Seoul Station without a certain occupation.

1. On June 18, 2019, at around 17:55, the Defendant: (a) demanded that the victim B (the age 61) who was engaged in snow education and ion activities using microphones against many unspecified players in front of the exit 13 of the Seoul Central-gu, Seoul Central-gu, Seoul, might be exposed to the damage of property and the assault; (b) on the ground that the victim neglected the use of microphones; (c) but (d) on the ground that the victim neglected the use of microphones, the Defendant destroyed the cell phone so that the cost of repair would be KRW 72,00,000 by cutting the cell phone into the ground and cutting the cell phone into the ground; and (d) the head of the victim’s head under this provision would be at once the floor.

As a result, the Defendant destroyed one cell phone owned by the victim and inflicted violence on the victim.

2. Definating;

A. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above, went with the victim, and there was a large number of fluorants, who publicly insultd the victim with the victim, “it is necessary to fluorize the victim as an bitch fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, etc., of this fluor.”

B. At around 18:30 of the same day, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim at the D police box located in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which had been arrested as a flagrant offender due to the above acts, on the part of police officers and civil petitioners, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to publicly insult the victim as follows: “A police officer who was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the above acts: (a) the flase of the gue gue, flase, and flase, flase, flase, flase.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of B and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (inspection of CCTV images at the site of accident);

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts;

arrow