1. The defendant (consolidated plaintiff) was 296,890.45 US dollars 296,890.45 on April 6, 2013 to the plaintiff (consolidated defendant).

1. Basic facts

A. Status 1) The plaintiff is the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China").

2) The Defendant Company is a company established for the purpose of selling clothes, shoess, and so on. (2) The Defendant Company is a company established for the purpose of manufacturing and manufacturing clothes, miscellaneous articles, wholesale and retail business, etc., and the Defendant is a representative of the Defendant Company as an internal director of the Defendant Company.

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company’s contract 1) concluded between the Defendant and the Defendant, the principal contractor, EPP Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “EPP”).

) E.S. Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E.S”).

(3) The principal contractor of the instant case, in total, shall be deemed to be the principal contractor of the instant case, and the principal contractor of the instant case shall be deemed to be the principal contractor of the instant case.

(1) The contract for the manufacture and supply of clothing to be supplied to the Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”).

2) On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on July 1, 2012, the product volume ($ 11,200) as of the date of concluding the contract as follows: C 2,200 Esp. 149,620 Esp. 1, 201: C 2,200 C 18,820 Esp. 30 on July 30, 2012; 21,650,076 Esp. 98,076 Es. 4, 2012; 34,397,397 168,006.71 T. 5,206 Esp. 1, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply in the form of “the supply date and 54,500,86,171, 297, 2017.”

C. The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant Company with the clothing as stipulated in the instant contract, as indicated in the respective “the details of supply” column of the attached list of supply.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3-1, 2, 3-1, 4-1, 2, 3-1-5, Eul evidence 4-1 through 6-5, Eul evidence 5-1 through 5, Eul evidence 6-1 through 5, 17, 20, 21, 22, 22 (written evidence of this lawsuit) and Eul evidence 2 are combined.