1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and the Defendant Company engaged in the housing construction business, etc. related to the Defendant Company started trade business from July 201 to start trade business.

On July 4, 2011, the Defendant Company employed the Plaintiff as the Vice Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy, and the Plaintiff was in charge of trade-related affairs of the Defendant Company, along with H (P).

B. The Plaintiff entered into an import agency contract of this case and entered into an import agency contract of this case 1) with the trade name “D (trade name after amendment: J)” as “D (trade name after amendment). 2) The Plaintiff entered into an import agency contract with F to the effect that “Defendant Company shall import the pre-paid car for children on behalf of Defendant Company F, but shall pay the import price to Defendant Company at the expense of Defendant Company, and F shall pay the import price to Defendant Company after selling the imported pre-paid car.”

On February 15, 2012, the volume of the revenue from the date of concluding the contract (US, US$) Nos. 1, 42,118 408 (No. 406 vehicles for children, two parts) second, April 27, 2012, the sales contract between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company on July 23, 2012, as follows: (a) the former 452 vehicles for children, No. 452, Jun. 5, 2012, No. 452, Jun. 8, 2012, No. 652, No. 653. 50, Jun. 23, 2012, No. 38,836 children, No. 202, Oct. 35, 2012, No. 908, Oct. 35, 2012, No. 40640, Jun. 23, 2012).

set forth in subsection (1) of this section shall be indicated by the transaction sequence when such transaction is named.

(4) In accordance with the import agency contract of this case, the Defendant Company (China located; hereinafter “K”) will import the front car and parts, etc. for children’s use of L (China located; hereinafter “L”), according to the import agency contract of this case, the Plaintiff obtained approval from the Defendant Company regarding the conclusion, etc. of the import agency contract of this case through H, and subsequently, prepared a written agreement with F to perform the import agency contract of this case.