logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017나51486
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant worked for the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) from July 201 to March 20, 201 as the vice head of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy from July 201 to March 20, 2013, and was in charge of the import transaction and management of goods.

B. Under a contract for import transaction of goods between the Plaintiff Company and C, the Defendant introduced C from D, known to the Defendant, to engage in the business of importing and selling pre-paid cars from China for children, and entered into a contract between the Plaintiff Company and C, under which the Plaintiff Company: (a) the Plaintiff Company: (b) the Plaintiff Company first pays for the pre-paid cars and parts of the goods requested by C; (c) the Plaintiff Company shall pay for the goods within the agreed period; and (d) the Plaintiff Company shall pay for the goods within the agreed period; and (c) the ownership of the goods to the Plaintiff Company until the full payment of the goods

As seen in the subsection, it concluded four times and traded goods.

(C) It is reasonable to view that it is a contract to which C has the right to dispose of the property.

On February 15, 2012, the number of purchase prices of goods (units: USD) per four times under a contract for import of goods (units) shall be 42,118.408 (former 406; Parts 2) 2, April 27, 2012, 2012, the previous 452, and the third 452, June 8, 2012 (Evidence 2-2) 55,153.50, the previous 652, the previous 652, the previous 652, the third 3rd 2, the previous 2012, the second 38, the second 2036, the second 4, the second 206, the second 4, the second 206, the second 20, the second 36, the second 206, the second 4, the second 206, the second 206, the second 201."

D. When the amount of goods imported by the Plaintiff Company is determined in the above import transaction contract and the third amendment contract, the Defendant shall make a proposal through the person in charge.

arrow