A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 30, 2016, around 22:20 on May 30, 2016, the injured Defendant called “E” operated by the injured party C (WW, 46 years of age) in D stores, demanding the injured party to change the amount of daily wages for 4 days and demanding the injured party to wear the injured party’s nose by hand.

In the end, the Defendant brought the victim with a face-to-face injury in need of treatment for up to seven days.

2. When the Defendant, at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, made the police officer’s statement of the instant case with respect to the police officer who was dispatched to the instant accident, the Defendant stated the Defendant’s statement on the instant accident, and signed the name “F, age column,” No. 42’s “in the name column of the written statement using the verification pen without authority for the purpose of driving the Defendant’s intent to conceal the Defendant’s fines,” “F, age column,” 102-901’s “in the workplace telephone column,” “H,” “in the workplace telephone column,” and “F,” followed the Defendant’s name.

Ultimately, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of the F’s statement, which is a private document on fact certification.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, submitted a forged statement to the police officer who was aware of the forgery as if it were duly formed.

4. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. On June 5, 2016, around 11:05, the Defendant forged F’s signature with the intent to use the forged signature in the column of the statement in the suspect interrogation protocol as “F”, and submitted it to the assistant of the above police station, who is aware of such forgery, to the following: (a) the Defendant entered the suspect interrogation protocol, which was 300 p.m. for 11:05 p.m.; and (b) under the investigation, he/she entered himself/herself as F; and (c) submitted it to the assistant of the above police station, who is aware of such forgery.

B. On June 5, 2016, the person against whom the investigation of the substitution was conducted at the same place as above, and as if he was F.