logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고정1740
사기등
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The act of forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document on June 12, 2014;

A. On June 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) indicated “C’s mobile phone purchase at a mobile phone sales store in Gwangju Mine-gu, and made D’s signature next to the name, “D in the column for subscription” of a new contract for mobile phone service using a verification-type pen” in the “C’s mobile phone purchase at a mobile phone sales store; and (b) on June 12, 2014, “In the state column,” respectively, on the 3th floor “in the city column, in the date of preparation”; and (c) signed D’s signature.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged a new contract for mobile phone service in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1-A, and at the same time and place, delivered a forged mobile phone service contract to the employee of a mobile phone sales store who is aware of such forgery as above as if he were the contract actually formed.

2. The act of forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document on March 10, 2015;

A. On March 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) purchased a mobile phone at the “F” mobile phone sales store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju; and (b) signed D’s signature on March 10, 2015, “F in the column for joining the mobile phone”; (c) “F in the column for joining the mobile phone”; (d) No. 105-dong 904, “in the state column”; and (d) on March 10, 2015, “F” on the date of preparation.

Accordingly, the defendant forged a mobile phone subscription application in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant at the time and place specified in Article 2-1(a) and at the same time and place, delivered a forged mobile phone entrance application as if it were a genuine application form, and exercised it.

3. The Defendant’s fraud, around April 28, 2015, in the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangju Mine-gu G apartment 105 Dong 904, and in the Internet NAH car page.

arrow