Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 23, 2015, around 2:27 p.m., the Defendant found a room that the victim C gets on the side seat floor of the city bus No. 6629, which was taken at the bus stops located in the bus stops in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (B). On the bank, the Defendant included a line that the victim C gets on the side seat floor. In the bank, the Defendant included a line, such as a just, a corporate body ck card, a lot card, a car card, a check card, a cash straw, a KRW 1,2,000, one KRW 2,000,000, KRW 2,000, Samsung Handphone-phone, and a driver’s license.

The Defendant did not follow necessary procedures such as returning the goods acquired as above to the victim and embezzled the goods with the above bank as he had on his own thought to have a place, which was set off at the fire rewing station in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of a crime, a report on an investigation (to be accompanied by CCTV images data in buses), a report on an investigation (in response to the execution of a warrant of seizure, search, and verification), and a report on an investigation (in the event of an intention

1. Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 360 (1) of the same Act

1. Imposition of a fine of KRW 300,000 (a penal penalty of KRW 300,000: a fine of KRW 300,000 has been imposed on the defendant, compared to a fine of KRW 70,000 has been lost in cash. However, in light of the content of the crime, the situation and progress of the investigation, the occupation and economic aspects of the defendant, etc., even if consideration of favorable reasons such as the defendant's confession as a primary offender, the victim's failure to punish, the amount of fine for the summary order is deemed to be adequate, even if consideration of favorable reasons such as the fact that the amount of damage is not large, etc

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;