Defendant

A KRW 1 million, Defendant B is punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant C and D are punished by a fine of KRW 4 million.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2015, Defendant A, at around 04:10 on March 8, 2015, she f, “F” in the member-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-si, a member-gu, was engaged in the foregoing drinking house with other customers, she was sleeping the victim’s breath, who was subject to control from the victim G, an employee of the foregoing drinking house.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant B, C, and D’s co-principal co-principal was the birth of the above A, and Defendant C and Defendant D were under the influence of drinking together with the above A at the drinking house described in paragraph 1 as between Defendant B and his friendship.

At around 04:10 on March 8, 2015, the Defendants: “The grandchildren ....” was spawed at the place as indicated in paragraph (1) at the place where 112 was reported and 112 was sent to that place; Defendant D was spawd to arrest Defendant D as a flagrant offender suspected of assault as stated in paragraph (1); Defendant C and Defendant B were spawd with Defendant C and Defendant B together with them, spawd and pushed the police officer’s body, arms and arms; Defendant B arrested himself as a flagrant offender in the obstruction of the performance of official duties, and spawd off the spawd, spathd, spathd, and spathd.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the 112 report processing and arrest of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the statement statement made to I, J and G by each police officer;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

B. Defendant B, C, and D: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The fact that the reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to be a criminal act committed by the Defendants while under the influence of alcohol, Defendant C and D do not have any criminal power, and Defendant A and B do not have any criminal power.