logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.01.18 2016노1927
업무방해등
Text

1. The guilty portion of the judgment below shall be reversed.

2. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months;

3.Provided, That this judgment shall not apply.

Reasons

1. An ex officio determination prosecutor demanded that the Defendant receive KRW 80,00,000 from D on March 1, 2016, from the F Mart in front of the Masan-si, the members of the Changwon-si, the first underground floor D around March 1, 2016, the Defendant, who was in front of the F Mart operated by D on March 1, 201, demanded that the Defendant receive KRW 80,00,000 from D to H and I of the police officer belonging to the G District Unit of the Masan-dong Police Station in the Masan-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Busan-dong, the Defendant was dismissed.

Accordingly, the above police officers “fatt fatt fatt fat, but 80,000 won within money shall be given to them.

그것도 못 받아 주는 것이 경찰이 가”, “ 어이구 씨 바, 옷 벗고 함 뛸까

Since fake soldiers suffered crys, there is a judicial authority.

Ga-gu Gabk Habk

The purpose of this study is to prevent the patrol car from departing from the patrol car, even though the police officer was forced to stop the patrol car from departing from the patrol car, it prevents the patrol car from departing from the patrol car, and prevents the patrol car from departing from the patrol car, by opening a sound, again opening a door, and opening a door to stop the patrol car.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order.

"Application for Amendments to Bill of Indictment" was filed, and this Court permitted it.

Inasmuch as the subject of adjudication was changed as above, the judgment of the court below became unable to be maintained as it is.

2. In conclusion, the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the following is ruled again after pleading, since there is a ground for reversal ex officio as above.

[ 다시 쓰는 판결] 범 죄 사 실 제 1. 항 『』 부분 기재와 같다.

Summary of Evidence

The gist of the evidence admitted by this Court is that of the judgment below.

arrow