A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 24, 2015, from around 13:00 to 13:15, the Defendant reported to the effect that the taxi engineer was in a cell phone in front of the Cju-si station located in Jinju-si to the effect that the taxi engineer was in a cell phone in front of the Cju-si station located in Jin-si, and thereby, led to the slope E belonging to the D District of the Jin-si Police Station, which should be called up and returned to confirm the facts and return as a result, and prevented the Defendant from moving ahead of the patrol while blockinging the front of the patrol, and preventing him from moving back to another place by moving the patrol.

The defendant, who is recommended to return home from the above E, called "Ia or Ia sar flab to the police station flab," and prevented the above patrol light from getting out of E continuously.

When the Defendant was unable to go up on the front door of the police officer under the above E, he taken off the face of E one time by hand, opened the front door according to E who gets on the front door of the police officer, and prevented the patrol vehicle from departing from the front door of the police officer. When the above front door was corrected, the Defendant assaulted the police officer to prevent the police officer from departing from the patrol vehicle by getting out of the front door of the patrol, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s reporting duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of cases of obstruction of the performance of official duties and investigation reports (to accompany videos submitted by a victim);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the balance of recommendations according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] : The group of crimes of obstruction of the performance of official duties, the obstruction of the performance of official duties, and the first category (the coercion of obstruction of the performance of official duties) (the scope of recommendations ] 6 months to 1 year and 4 months;

2. Although the criminal defendant in the decision of sentence does not have a liability for the crime in light of the fact that he/she uses violence against a police officer on official duty, the criminal defendant does not have such liability;