A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 06:20 on July 14, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was urged by the Defendant to return home from E of the police box affiliated with the police box at the above convenience store after receiving a report that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the above convenience store; (b) was aware of the foregoing E, such as “I am wrong when the launch occurred,” and continued to move E to another place on the part of the patrol seat so as not to close the door of the driver’s seat; and (b) the Defendant was unable to start the patrol car for about 20 minutes by sticking his body to the seat of the patrol seat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer's 112 reporting, visit and patrol duty.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the police officer commits an error, the fact that the police officer exercised his/her indirect tangible power against the police officer, and the fact that he/she has no criminal record of a suspended execution or more

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;