A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 12, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for a violation of business affairs by the Seoul Northern District Court on June 2, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2017, and is still under suspended sentence.

1. Around December 18, 2017, the Defendant: (a) destroyed a special property: (b) on the front of the Seoul Southern-gu Seoul Southern-gu road; (c) on the ground that Dysting car driven by C from the victim galton Co., Ltd. was clicked, the Defendant: (d) tried to open the car on two occasions in the direction of the driver’s seat; (d) but (e) the Defendant tried to open the car on two occasions, but (e) the Defendant was able to repair the car owned by the victim by using the string-top car on the side of the driver’s seat; (e) but (e) the Plaintiff was able to open the car on two occasions, but (e) the vehicle was made of a tree, which is a dangerous object that was throwed down on the side of the road by drinking, with its windows set up on a 70cc wide, a vertical 60cc meter.

2. Around December 18, 2017, the Defendant, who received a report at the place specified in paragraph 1, and was arrested from the victim F, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Southern Police Station E box, who was called out, as a current offender, and was arrested from the victim F, who was the police officer affiliated with the Seoul Southern Police Station E box, and among the surrounding citizens, the Defendant sexually insultingd the victim by openly insulting the victim by referring to the victim as “salping, saluting, saluting, saluting, and saluting.”

3. On December 18, 2017, the Defendant attempted to damage goods for public use, who was arrested as a current offender on the grounds as above, and moved to a patrol boat and to an E police box on the said grounds, and demanded F to get off the patrol boat, thereby trying to damage the glass of the patrol boat, which is a case for public use, and did not go to an attempted crime because the glass was not broken.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement;

1. Written complaint and written estimate;

1. Photographs;

1. Previous conviction: Application of a written inquiry about criminal history, and the text of the judgment;

1. Article 369 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 369 of the choice of punishment.