Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On November 15, 2015, in front of the E convenience store located in Gwangju Mine-gu, Gwangju, about 22:50 on November 15, 2015, the Defendant damaged the Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant, a one-way employee B, was able to cause an accident by scambling the way to G gate of the victim Furb, which is the cause of food delivery, on the ground that he was able to cause an accident, the Defendant and the victim were defective, and the Defendant was able to remove the scam different from the victim, and the above scamba in front of the above scamba, which was set up

B. On November 15, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender from the victim I (53 tax), the circumstances leading up to the H District of the Mine Police Station H District, who was called out after receiving a report on November 23:05 on the same ground as the preceding paragraph, and the Defendant was arrested from the JJ on the ground that he was in contact with the victim I (53 tax) and the situation, thereby interfering with the performance of official duties and the Defendant’s injury.

It is also a police case.

“In doing so, the face of the I was at least once with the right part of the Blue under the Blue of the Blue.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 report processing duties, and at the same time, the victim suffered damage to the character of the audience play, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.

(c)

The Defendant damaged public goods at the same time, at the same place as paragraph 1-b, and for the reasons stated in paragraph 1-b, damaged the use of the goods used by the office of the next 152,020 won for repairing the goods used by the 112 patrol vehicles, which are parked on the road, on the 112 patrol vehicles.

2. 피고인 B 피고인은 제 1의 나 항과 같은 일시, 장소에서, 피고인의 일 행인 위 A이 위 I와 피해자 J(50 세 )로부터 현행 범인으로 체포당하자 이를 저지하기 위하여 발로 위 I의 좌측 다리 부분을 2회, 위 J의 우측 다리 부분을 3회 각각 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reports and arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, he left the right side which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the J of the victim.

b)a summary of the evidence;