logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.17 2018고정817
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 4, 2017, the Defendant, within the police box located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu Seoul on September 21:36, 2017, shall, without any justifiable reason, debris to police officers, such as ice D, etc. under the influence of alcohol, without any reason, and “The flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flob flo

In this regard, I am hicked by a large sound, such as this stone hump hack, and am hicked and slicked by a horse and behavior that led to about 8 minutes of pedal while I am hicked the documents hicked.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A criminal investigation report and a criminal investigation report (in cases of a suspect's drinking alcohol);

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender (A);

1. Part 1 CD 1 of CCTV reproduction of CCTV images inside the police box, and one CD 1 of mobile phone image reproduction [Defendant and his defense counsel stated that "the defendant and his defense counsel did an illegal official duty to the defendant at the police box, and merely did an act to revoke the defendant's act in the process of resisting the defendant's act, which does not violate the social rules, and thus is dismissed from illegality." However, in full view of the evidence in the judgment, it is recognized that the defendant committed an act to revoke the police box at the police box, and thereby, it was difficult for the police officer to properly perform his duties by speaking or speaking for more severe time as he was arrested as a current criminal, thereby making it difficult for the police officer to properly perform his duties. Accordingly, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion based on different premise is not accepted (in the meantime, it appears that the circumstance that the defendant visited the police box would be ordered to submit a complaint or a complaint-related procedure, but the defendant could not deliver his intention to the police officer at the time of drinking).]

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow