logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.06.09 2014가합25959
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a foundation that operates a single-national University Hospital (hereinafter "the defendant hospital") under its jurisdiction, and the plaintiff is a patient who has received medical treatment at the defendant hospital.

B. On January 29, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to traffic accident around 05:00, and passed through Nonparty B Hospital, and was placed in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital at around 11:41 on the same day. At the time, the Plaintiff was at the time of the Plaintiff’s medical personnel who suffered injury to the upper right side of the mouth, fladation, damage to the right side fladation, damage to the left side fladation, and fladation of the upper left side and the upper left side of the fladation, and fladation of the fladation of the flady, etc. on January 30, 2012.2) On the other hand, the Plaintiff was at the time of the Plaintiff’s medical personnel’s implementation of the fladation of the upper right flag, 17mHg, 16mHg (100mH-20mH), but was at the left side of the C-hand level and the upper left side.

In addition, due to the cutting of the aggregate of the left-hand side, there was an opinion that it was difficult to diversize the diversity and the upper diversity of the goods.

3) On February 8, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) on February 8, 2012, from the sexual surgery of the Defendant Hospital, he/she is performing the primary surgery due to the extraction of the left-hand and the aggregate.

(B) B, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital was in line with the left-hand left-hand form. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital recovered the outer part of the Defendant’s escape from the mouth at the time of the first operation and inserting artificial substances (hereinafter “influents”).

In addition, the procedure was conducted to prevent the pelvise.

After the completion of the first operation, the plaintiff showed a normal opinion on the same line, but due to the first operation, the part of the left-hand side was serious.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital continued to provide the preservation treatment on the part of the surgery, such as cooling soup, frying, infrying, injecting, and flaging, and flaging, and the Plaintiff after February 13, 2012.

arrow