1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. From August 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by visiting a member of the B member’s meeting with a serious comprehion, and was diagnosed as a flag’s old-path and good faith certificate.

B. On January 15, 2014, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant” or the “Defendant Hospital”) and was hospitalized at the obsteinium and steinium established and operated by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”), and was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on January 26, 2014, and was subject to pre-operation tests and treatment.

C. On January 27, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed an electronic chronology surgery (hereinafter “the instant primary surgery”). During the instant primary surgery, the Defendant Hospital’s medical personnel observed the view open to breath in light of urine and urine, and performed urine batium and urine batium installation surgery. On February 4, 2014, the Defendant Hospital removed the batium on the left side of the surgery, removed the batium on February 7, 2014, and removed the batium on the left side of the surgery.

On February 20, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed a bruptive operation (hereinafter “the instant secondary operation”) on February 20, 2014 in order to verify whether or not the bruptive disease complies with the first operation.

E. On March 25, 2014, the Plaintiff prepared a discharge certificate, and discharged the Plaintiff on March 25, 2014.

F. On March 28, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital hospitalized in the female urology as the symptoms were sent to the Plaintiff to the address.

G. On April 18, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observed the Plaintiff’s lapsing opinion and implemented the lapsing CT inspection on Apr. 18, 2014, the left-hand side of the hospital confirmed the lauting opinion, and the Defendant Hospital performed an operation to inserting the lauting laute and the trauting content into the left-hand center on Apr. 22, 2014.

H. Since then, the Plaintiff was transferred to Samsung Seoul Hospital, and was implemented on June 27, 2014 on the left-hand side of the opening of Samsung-Seoul Hospital and the need for refluence and refluence.

Since then, the plaintiff was diagnosed as a pulmatic injury in the dynamicology test to which the symptoms of the fact-finding occurred, and was diagnosed as a pulmatic injury.

I. The plaintiff.