The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was diagnosed by the 19-year old 19-old marrosis and was treated by the mouth of the left-hand side at around the age of 23, and was diagnosed as the 3rd grade 5 of the delayed disability on February 7, 2002, due to the fact that the Plaintiff was demoted to the left-hand side.

On December 8, 2003, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a chronic dystyposis and the left-hand dystypitis by visiting the hospital operated by the Defendant C (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. In order to facilitate the Plaintiff’s artificial coloning surgery, the medical professionals at the Defendant Hospital first conducted the left-hand side humping surgery and the extension of the mouth (hereinafter “the instant surgery”). The Plaintiff hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital on December 10, 203.

On December 11, 2003, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had been performing the instant treatment against the Plaintiff, and as a result, blood transfusion occurred due to the cryposis, and completed the surgery in a state where the cryption of the crypine cryption was complete without performing the cryption of the cryption.

(c)

The medical personnel of the defendant hospital administered the plaintiff as an antibiotic, the flumin on December 10, 2003, and from the 16th day of the same month, and on December 31, 2003, when the plaintiff's operation flioxacin was detected, the alteration was changed from January 1, 2004 to the pro rata flioxacin.

The plaintiff was discharged on January 6, 2004.

On the other hand, at the time of the instant treatment, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital recovered the Plaintiff’s aggregate tissue and conducted the examination, and the result showed that the Plaintiff had chronic aggregate infection.

(d)

After the discharge of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a chronic dypitis with no chronic dypitis. On December 21, 2005, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a dypitis with the chronic dypitis with the math and the chronic dypitis from the hospital in Seoul National University Hospital; on November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as a dypitis with the chronic dypitis; and on November 1, 2013, the Plaintiff left the left dyposis due to continued infection until the end of the pleadings in this case.