logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.07.09 2018가단103881
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff, around 2005, inside the bones of the bones, which constitutes a stoke of the right by an explosion.

1. Hashes to connect the bones with the outer side of the salll and the salll;

A. Around 2008, when surgery was performed at C Hospital due to minculation of the bones, etc., the length of the right bridge was extended. However, after the operation, there were serious symptoms showing weight to the outside of the right edge at the time of walking.

B. On December 21, 2015, the Plaintiff, upon receiving treatment from the D Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), stated that the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital want to correct the shorter part of the surgery and the short length of the bridge to the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital.

Accordingly, on December 28, 2015, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital confirmed the revolving of the Plaintiff and the change of the right side satisfaction with the Plaintiff, and on January 7, 2016, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital performed the instant first operation (hereinafter “the instant first operation”).

C. On July 4, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an appeal against the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital for the symptoms from which the body and body were to be caused, and on August 2, 2016, the medical personnel at the Defendant Hospital performed the instant secondary surgery against the Plaintiff on the left-hand side (hereinafter “instant secondary surgery”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence A Nos. 1 through 9, the result of the commission of physical examinations to the E Hospital Head of this Court, and the result of the commission of medical examination to the F Hospital Head, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff had a high right frame after the first operation of this case, and caused the symptoms of the symptoms of high side and fireing the left side and the back side elbow, which are less than the left side, without contact with the ground. This error was made in the location or direction of the fluoral and refluoral part of the fluoral part, which is included in the first operation, in the process of performing the said first operation.

arrow