logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.02 2016가합207502
용역비
Text

The defendant paid KRW 536,938,710 to the plaintiff and 6% per annum from July 27, 2015 to November 2, 2017.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a rearrangement project management contractor under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), and the Defendant comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the Defendant’s Promotion Committee for the Establishment of Housing Redevelopment and Improvement of Urban Areas (hereinafter “Defendant Promotion Committee”) by obtaining authorization from the head of the Daegu Metropolitan City on July 21, 2014, as an association established under the Urban Improvement Act for the purpose of redevelopment of buildings located in the project district located in the Daegu Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant project”).

On January 20, 2009, the Defendant Promotion Committee held a residents' general meeting with regard to the selection of a specialized management businessman of rearrangement projects and the delegation of contract as an agenda item, and selected the Plaintiff as a specialized management businessman of rearrangement projects. On February 9, 2009, the Defendant Promotion Committee concluded a contract for specialized management of rearrangement projects with the purport that the Plaintiff will perform all affairs necessary for the implementation of the project of this case, including the Plaintiff and the association establishment approval, the review of feasibility

(hereinafter “instant contract”). The agency services under Article 3 (Period and Scope of Service Affairs) of the instant case (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) shall be from the time of the contract to the time of liquidation, and the scope of service services shall be as follows:

(1) Preparation of an implementation plan for establishing an association and granting authorization or permission therefor. (2) Subsidizing affairs concerning the selection of designers and work executors. (3) Vicarious execution of affairs concerning the application for authorization to implement an implementation plan. (5) Examining design documents and the details of changes in construction expenses. (7) Review of affairs concerning designation of an improvement zone.

arrow